This Stage used 3 Reward Models

DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese artificial intelligence business that establishes open-source large language models (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and moneyed by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, developed the business in 2023 and serves as its CEO.

The DeepSeek-R1 model supplies responses equivalent to other contemporary large language designs, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a substantially lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and requires a tenth of the computing power of a comparable LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI models were established amidst United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were planned to restrict the ability of these two countries to develop sophisticated AI systems. [6] [7]

On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek released its first complimentary chatbot app, based on the DeepSeek-R1 design, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had exceeded ChatGPT as the most-downloaded complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] causing Nvidia’s share price to drop by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success versus bigger and more recognized competitors has actually been referred to as “upending AI”, [8] making up “the very first shot at what is emerging as an international AI area race”, [11] and introducing “a brand-new period of AI brinkmanship”. [12]

DeepSeek makes its generative synthetic intelligence algorithms, models, and training information open-source, allowing its code to be freely readily available for use, adjustment, viewing, and creating files for building functions. [13] The company apparently strongly hires young AI scientists from leading Chinese universities, [8] and employs from outside the computer technology field to diversify its models’ understanding and abilities. [3]

In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI lover Liang Wenfeng, who had been trading since the 2007-2008 financial crisis while attending Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he established High-Flyer as a hedge fund focused on establishing and utilizing AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer specifically used AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has actually made its generative expert system chatbot open source, indicating its code is freely readily available for use, adjustment, and watching. This consists of permission to access and use the source code, as well as style files, for constructing purposes. [13]

According to 36Kr, Liang had actually built up a shop of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are used to train AI [16], before the United States federal government imposed AI chip limitations on China. [15]

In April 2023, High-Flyer started an artificial basic intelligence lab devoted to research study establishing AI tools separate from High-Flyer’s monetary organization. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the investors, the laboratory became its own company, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Equity capital firms were unwilling in providing financing as it was not likely that it would be able to generate an exit in a short time period. [15]

After launching DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which provided strong performance for a low rate, DeepSeek became called the catalyst for China’s AI model rate war. It was quickly dubbed the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other major tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba started to cut the cost of their AI designs to take on the company. Despite the low cost charged by DeepSeek, it paid compared to its rivals that were losing money. [20]

DeepSeek is concentrated on research and has no detailed strategies for commercialization; [20] this likewise allows its technology to avoid the most stringent provisions of China’s AI policies, such as requiring consumer-facing technology to comply with the government’s controls on details. [3]

DeepSeek’s hiring preferences target technical abilities rather than work experience, resulting in the majority of brand-new hires being either recent university graduates or designers whose AI careers are less established. [18] [3] Likewise, the company hires individuals with no computer technology background to assist its innovation understand other subjects and knowledge areas, consisting of having the ability to generate poetry and perform well on the notoriously tough Chinese college admissions examinations (Gaokao). [3]

Development and release history

DeepSeek LLM

On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek launched its very first series of design, DeepSeek-Coder, which is available for complimentary to both scientists and business users. The code for the design was made open-source under the MIT license, with an extra license agreement (“DeepSeek license”) relating to “open and accountable downstream usage” for the model itself. [21]

They are of the same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed listed below. The series consists of 8 designs, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]

1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base designs.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of guideline information. This produced the Instruct designs.

They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, linked by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]

On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-LLM series of models, with 7B and 67B parameters in both Base and Chat kinds (no Instruct was released). It was established to contend with other LLMs available at the time. The paper declared benchmark outcomes higher than a lot of open source LLMs at the time, specifically Llama 2. [26]: section 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the model was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the design itself. [27]

The architecture was basically the very same as those of the Llama series. They utilized the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text acquired by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]

The Chat variations of the 2 Base designs was also launched simultaneously, acquired by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]

On 9 January 2024, they launched 2 DeepSeek-MoE models (Base, Chat), each of 16B specifications (2.7 B triggered per token, 4K context length). The training was basically the very same as DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They declared equivalent performance with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variant of the basic sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared specialists” that are always queried, and “routed professionals” that might not be. They found this to assist with expert balancing. In standard MoE, some professionals can end up being overly relied on, while other professionals may be hardly ever utilized, squandering specifications. Attempting to balance the professionals so that they are equally used then causes professionals to reproduce the same capacity. They proposed the shared professionals to learn core capabilities that are typically used, and let the routed professionals to discover the peripheral capabilities that are hardly ever used. [28]

In April 2024, they launched 3 DeepSeek-Math models specialized for doing math: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]

1. Initialize with a formerly pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base design.
3. Train an instruction-following model by SFT Base with 776K mathematics issues and their tool-use-integrated detailed services. This produced the Instruct design.
Reinforcement knowing (RL): The reward model was a process benefit design (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd method. [30] This benefit design was then used to train Instruct using group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K math concerns “associated to GSM8K and MATH”. The reward design was continuously updated throughout training to prevent reward hacking. This resulted in the RL model.

V2

In May 2024, they released the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series includes 4 designs, 2 base designs (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The two bigger designs were trained as follows: [31]

1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K utilizing YaRN. [32] This led to DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M circumstances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for security. This resulted in DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not released.
4. RL using GRPO in two phases. The very first stage was trained to fix mathematics and coding problems. This phase used 1 reward model, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for math). The 2nd phase was trained to be helpful, safe, and follow guidelines. This stage utilized 3 benefit designs. The helpfulness and security reward designs were trained on human preference data. The rule-based benefit design was manually configured. All experienced benefit designs were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This resulted in the launched version of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.

They chose for 2-staged RL, because they found that RL on thinking information had “special qualities” different from RL on basic data. For instance, RL on thinking could improve over more training actions. [31]

The 2 V2-Lite models were smaller sized, and experienced similarly, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat only underwent SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite variation to help “additional research study and advancement on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]

Architecturally, the V2 models were significantly customized from the DeepSeek LLM series. They changed the basic attention mechanism by a low-rank approximation called multi-head hidden attention (MLA), and used the mix of specialists (MoE) alternative formerly released in January. [28]

The Financial Times reported that it was cheaper than its peers with a price of 2 RMB for every single million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]

In June 2024, they released 4 designs in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]

1. The Base models were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the variation at the end of pretraining), then pretrained further for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base designs.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were utilized to produce 20K code-related and 30K math-related guideline information, then combined with a direction dataset of 300M tokens. This was used for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for math issues was calculated by comparing with the ground-truth label. The benefit for code issues was generated by a benefit model trained to forecast whether a program would pass the unit tests.

DeepSeek-V2.5 was launched in September and upgraded in December 2024. It was made by combining DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]

V3

In December 2024, they launched a base design DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat design DeepSeek-V3. The model architecture is essentially the like V2. They were trained as follows: [37]

1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, primarily English and Chinese. It consisted of a greater ratio of math and shows than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length two times, from 4K to 32K and after that to 128K, using YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 epochs on 1.5 M samples of reasoning (math, shows, logic) and non-reasoning (innovative writing, roleplay, basic concern answering) information. Reasoning data was created by “skilled models”. Non-reasoning information was produced by DeepSeek-V2.5 and examined by human beings. – The “skilled models” were trained by beginning with an unspecified base design, then SFT on both information, and synthetic information generated by an internal DeepSeek-R1 model. The system timely asked the R1 to show and validate during thinking. Then the specialist designs were RL using an unspecified benefit function.
– Each professional design was trained to create simply artificial thinking information in one particular domain (math, programming, logic).
– Expert designs were utilized, instead of R1 itself, considering that the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, poor formatting, and extreme length”.

4. Model-based reward models were made by beginning with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human preference information consisting of both final reward and chain-of-thought causing the last benefit. The reward model produced benefit signals for both questions with objective but free-form answers, and questions without objective answers (such as writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO utilizing both reward models and rule-based reward. The rule-based reward was calculated for mathematics problems with a last answer (put in a box), and for programming issues by system tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.

The DeepSeek team performed extensive low-level engineering to accomplish effectiveness. They utilized mixed-precision arithmetic. Much of the forward pass was carried out in 8-bit drifting point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) rather than the standard 32-bit, requiring special GEMM routines to collect accurately. They used a customized 12-bit float (E5M6) for just the inputs to the direct layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states remained in 16-bit (BF16). They minimized the communication latency by overlapping extensively computation and interaction, such as devoting 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for only inter-GPU interaction. They lowered communication by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the precise device each expert was on in order to prevent specific devices being queried more frequently than the others, adding auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing strategies. [37]

After training, it was released on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are connected by NVLink, and the clusters are connected by InfiniBand. [37]

Benchmark tests reveal that DeepSeek-V3 outshined Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]

R1

On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview ended up being available via DeepSeek’s API, as well as by means of a chat user interface after visiting. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for sensible inference, mathematical reasoning, and real-time problem-solving. DeepSeek claimed that it surpassed performance of OpenAI o1 on criteria such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal stated when it utilized 15 issues from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 design reached a solution quicker than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]

On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek launched DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The business also released some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” models, which are not initialized on V3-Base, but instead are initialized from other pretrained open-weight models, consisting of LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on artificial information generated by R1. [47]

A conversation between User and Assistant. The user asks a question, and the Assistant resolves it. The assistant first thinks of the reasoning process in the mind and then offers the user with the answer. The thinking procedure and response are confined within and tags, respectively, i.e., reasoning process here answer here. User:. Assistant:

DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained solely using GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous versions, they utilized no model-based benefit. All benefit functions were rule-based, “primarily” of 2 types (other types were not specified): precision benefits and format benefits. Accuracy benefit was inspecting whether a boxed response is appropriate (for math) or whether a code passes tests (for shows). Format benefit was checking whether the model puts its thinking trace within … [47]

As R1-Zero has concerns with readability and mixing languages, R1 was trained to address these concerns and further improve thinking: [47]

1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” information all with the basic format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the very same RL process as R1-Zero, however also with a “language consistency reward” to encourage it to react monolingually. This produced an internal design not launched.
3. Synthesize 600K thinking data from the internal model, with rejection tasting (i.e. if the generated thinking had a wrong last response, then it is gotten rid of). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, accurate QA, self-cognition, translation) utilizing DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K artificial information for 2 epochs.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based benefit (for thinking tasks) and model-based reward (for non-reasoning jobs, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.

Distilled designs were trained by SFT on 800K information manufactured from DeepSeek-R1, in a comparable method as step 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]

Assessment and responses

DeepSeek launched its AI Assistant, which utilizes the V3 model as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had actually exceeded ChatGPT as the highest-rated totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot supposedly answers questions, fixes reasoning problems and composes computer system programs on par with other chatbots on the market, according to benchmark tests used by American AI business. [3]

DeepSeek-V3 uses considerably fewer resources compared to its peers; for example, whereas the world’s leading AI companies train their chatbots with supercomputers utilizing as numerous as 16,000 graphics processing units (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek claims to have actually needed only about 2,000 GPUs, specifically the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at an expense of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is approximately one tenth of what United States tech giant Meta invested building its latest AI innovation. [3]

DeepSeek’s competitive efficiency at fairly minimal cost has actually been acknowledged as potentially challenging the global supremacy of American AI designs. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, described the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik minute” for American AI. [49] [50] The performance of its R1 design was apparently “on par with” one of OpenAI’s newest models when used for tasks such as mathematics, coding, and natural language thinking; [51] echoing other analysts, American Silicon Valley endeavor capitalist Marc Andreessen also described R1 as “AI’s Sputnik minute”. [51]

DeepSeek’s creator, Liang Wenfeng has actually been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media commonly applauded DeepSeek as a nationwide asset. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang welcomed Liang Wenfeng to his symposium with professionals and asked him to offer opinions and recommendations on a draft for comments of the yearly 2024 government work report. [55]

DeepSeek’s optimization of limited resources has highlighted possible limitations of United States sanctions on China’s AI advancement, that include export constraints on advanced AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the company’s AI designs consequently “sparked market chaos” [57] and triggered shares in major worldwide innovation business to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of rival Broadcom. Other tech companies also sank, consisting of Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip equipment maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A worldwide selloff of innovation stocks on Nasdaq, prompted by the release of the R1 model, had actually caused tape-record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and computer system hardware business; [59] by 28 January 2025, an overall of $1 trillion of worth was rubbed out American stocks. [50]

Leading figures in the American AI sector had blended reactions to DeepSeek’s success and efficiency. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose business are associated with the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to establish American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “extremely remarkable”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who announced The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a favorable advancement. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, including Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk revealed suspicion of the app’s efficiency or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various companies, consisting of Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are looking for to utilize the model in their program. [68]

On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek limited its brand-new user registration to contact number from mainland China, e-mail addresses, or Google account logins, following a “large-scale” cyberattack disrupted the proper performance of its servers. [69] [70]

Some sources have actually observed that the main application programming user interface (API) version of R1, which runs from servers located in China, uses censorship systems for topics that are considered politically delicate for the federal government of China. For instance, the model refuses to respond to questions about the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, contrasts in between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI might initially generate a response, however then erases it shortly later on and changes it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my present scope. Let’s speak about something else.” [72] The integrated censorship mechanisms and constraints can just be eliminated to a restricted extent in the open-source variation of the R1 model. If the “core socialist worths” defined by the Chinese Internet regulative authorities are discussed, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, discussions are ended. [74] When checked by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 described Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s territory,” and specified: “We firmly oppose any form of ‘Taiwan independence’ separatist activities and are dedicated to achieving the complete reunification of the motherland through serene means.” [75] In January 2025, Western scientists had the ability to trick DeepSeek into offering particular responses to a few of these subjects by requesting in its response to swap certain letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]

Security and personal privacy

Some professionals fear that the government of China could utilize the AI system for foreign impact operations, spreading disinformation, monitoring and the advancement of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s privacy terms state “We keep the details we collect in protected servers found in the People’s Republic of China … We may collect your text or audio input, timely, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other material that you supply to our design and Services”. Although the information storage and collection policy follows ChatGPT’s privacy policy, [79] a Wired short article reports this as security concerns. [80] In action, the Italian data security authority is looking for extra information on DeepSeek’s collection and use of personal data, and the United States National Security Council revealed that it had actually started a nationwide security evaluation. [81] [82] Taiwan’s federal government prohibited using DeepSeek at federal government ministries on security premises and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened a questions into DeepSeek’s usage of individual information. [83]

Expert system industry in China.

Notes

^ a b c The variety of heads does not equal the variety of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the model called DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was released as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview required picking “Deep Think allowed”, and every user might utilize it just 50 times a day.
References

^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s low-cost, open AI design DeepSeek delights researchers”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic exposes an AI world ready to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Competing With Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s more affordable models and weaker chips bring into question trillions in AI facilities costs”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports might hit India’s AI aspirations”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia investigation signals broadening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dismisses ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you need to know”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it triggering Nvidia and other stocks to plunge?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares topple as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a top Chinese AI design overcame US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the initial on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is changing how AI models are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI leader”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at main · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at main”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at main”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at main”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s brand-new AI model exceeds Meta, OpenAI items”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, surpasses Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s brand-new AI design seems among the best ‘open’ oppositions yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: releasing supercharged reasoning power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the original on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s very first reasoning design R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, however China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs through Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI startup DeepSeek overtakes ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has actually reached its Sputnik minute”. The Hill. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik moment’: $1tn rubbed out US stocks after Chinese firm reveals AI chatbot” – by means of The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI startup that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek postures a difficulty to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock rout, Graphika says”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 ， 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI business’s AI model advancement highlights limits of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot triggers US market chaos, wiping $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek triggers international AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of worth”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ but Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella touts DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “extremely impressive”: “We need to take the advancements out of China extremely, really seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek model ‘impressive'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson bashes China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek development “positive””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – by means of NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman applauds: What leaders say on DeepSeek’s interruption”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘questions’ DeepSeek’s claims, recommends enormous Nvidia GPU infrastructure”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS customers, consisting of Stripe and Toyota, are pestering the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI models”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek hit with ‘large-scale’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app stores”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek temporarily restricted new sign-ups, citing ‘massive harmful attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has actually triggered a $1 trillion panic – and it doesn’t appreciate complimentary speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship appears like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We tried out DeepSeek. It worked well, until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on a worldwide AI race: geopolitics, innovation and the increase of turmoil”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek jolts Silicon Valley, providing the AI race its ‘Sputnik moment'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI positions formidable cyber, information privacy hazards”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts advise care over use of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has painted a substantial TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator inquires from DeepSeek on data security”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House assesses impact of China AI app DeepSeek on national security, authorities says”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.