Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal employees have until February 6 to choose whether to voluntarily leave their jobs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed workers on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be enabled to take leave and be paid until the end of September. Michelle Bercovici is an employment legal representative who represents federal employees as a large part of her practice, so I asked her for her interpretation about what OPM’s delayed resignation program would really mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I in fact don’t consider it a lot a deal. I believe it’s a demand to resign with a vague pledge that, potentially, you could be kept in administrative leave status for approximately 8 months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have actually been utilizing the term buyout to describe what this is since there appears to be the offer of for approximately 8 months if you take this offer. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would definitely not describe it as a buyout. I think that’s a really misleading term to use in this situation. When you believe of a buyout, there’s normally some sort of composed contract or a concrete deal to supply a benefit in exchange for waiving certain rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for your guidance, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we tell them is workout severe care. There are no guarantees consisted of in this e-mail. The only thing I can tell you for specific is that if you change your mind, the company’s probably not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are basically giving up control over a lot.MARTIN: somalibidders.com Is there some classification of employee who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is someone like that might this be an attractive offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement need to be the most mindful since leaving earlier than planned can have serious repercussions, potentially, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She told reporters that this is a bargain for individuals who do not wish to return to the office. Let me just play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a suggestion to federal employees that they need to return in – to work. And if they don’t, then they have the alternative to resign, and this administration is extremely kindly using to pay them for eight months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It simply – in a method, it breaks my heart that federal workers are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order is in bad faith, that it’s designed to get folks who work truly tough to resign. I believe it’s trying to pull the wool over a lot of people’s eyes because there are no warranties. And these are individuals who enjoy their job. They like the objective of the firm. They work hard. And today, they’re facing really difficult options, specifically if they’re remote. I imply, it’s really coercive.MARTIN: You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re someone who resides in Oregon and has been informed to report to D.C. or else we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: referall.us Do you anticipate legal difficulties simply to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be sincere, is so unprecedented that I think a lot of us are still trying to determine what to do with it. I’m unsure if the offer itself might be challengeable. I believe the larger question is the execution of these terms. I’m not familiar with any authority that exists right now for OPM to purchase agencies to offer this number of people administrative leave. So I believe it is very much potentially setting the stage for obstacles due to the fact that I feel OPM has actually significantly surpassed their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is a work attorney with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you a lot for signing up with us.BERCOVICI: Thank you a lot for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights scheduled. Visit our website terms of use and approvals pages at www.npr.org for further details.

NPR transcripts are developed on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This text may not remain in its last form and might be upgraded or modified in the future. Accuracy and accessibility might differ. The reliable record of NPR’s shows is the audio record.